Position One
For the first three weeks I shadowed here, Dr. D didn't insert a single IUD. However, I knew she prescribed them because during the first few days she recommended one and we discussed it. Dr. D is pro-life; however, she read some research long ago that showed her IUDs don't carry a higher miscarriage rate than normal, healthy young women. Thus, she believes they are not abortafacient.
I searched for the article and I think I found it, but I can't be sure, since Dr. D only remembers that it was published about twenty years ago. I contacted the second author on a similar paper. This author wrote back:
And am I the one to call this to Dr. D's attention? "Dr. D, you know you've been inserting abortafacients all these years, right?" Boy, would it strain a so-far pleasant mentor-mentee relationship. Is it my place? Is it my duty? I get a headache and a heartache just thinking about it. Bottom Line: IUDs work by inhibiting sperm transport but all these methods have back up mechanisms, just like hormonal contraception - - interfering with implantation should ovulation / fertilization occur.
Position Two
I'm a Catholic and morally opposed to contraceptives whether or not they are abortafacient. Thus, I'm wearied watching all of my mentors prescribe, recommend, endorse, encourage, and expect contraception and perform sterilization.
This is not usually a problem when the contraceptives are pills, rings, patches, condoms, caps, implants, shots, etc because I am not capable of being involved. (The story was a little different when I used to work at a pharmacy and had to decline ringing people up for birth control.) However, as a medical student learning in small steps to participate in procedures, I am definitely vulnerable to participating in an IUD insertion.
Thus, if there hadn't been any IUD insertions during my externship, I could've avoided asserting my right to conscience. Alas! 'Twas not to be...
The Story
As soon as I saw "IUD insertion" on the schedule I called the NCBC hotline, asking what to do. I remembered awkwardly excusing myself from Dr. C's tubal ligation, but some intervening reading and conversation (especially at IBPCA and with my mom) gave me cause to think I could watch if I didn't do anything. This was confirmed by the ethicist on call.I still hoped I wouldn't have to assert my right to conscience. There was a slim possibility I wouldn't have to do anything: in minor procedures like colposcopies, Dr. D's medical assistant helped her by default, and I only helped when there was a staff shortage. I hoped that the medical assistant would do the same. I approached her and asked about the procedure.
"So, what's an IUD insertion like?" She described it briefly, and I asked, "so, do you usually help?"
"Oh no, Dr. D does it all herself; the tray's all ready."
My heart plummeted. If Dr. D did it herself and it was only she and I in the room, I would have to explain my conscience beforehand to avoid awkwardly being unable to squirt betadine on a sponge.
So, I explained myself. "Because I'm Catholic, I can observe, but not assist," I told Dr. D when she came in.
"Oh, okay," she replied, and added that I didn't have to watch if I didn't want to.
"No," I said slowly. "Knowledge is good." It was important that I know all I could about this procedure in order to present it accurately to my future patients...the truth isn't served by coercion and misinformation.
If IUDs were for something besides contraception, I'd easily think IUD insertions are nifty procedures. The insertion device is so well built and the site is accessible, making the process in-office and quick....
So I watched the insertion. The patient experienced pain (she wasn't given any analgesia) and had a vasovagal reaction afterwards although there were no serious complications. I felt a little disgusted that anyone would put a woman through pain like that for no good purpose (in fact, to evil ends). It was hard to watch, and weird to think that all the people in the room were cooperating in evil (to one degree of culpability or another) except me, who stood there in the middle of everything.
It's a painful experience that I often have...to be in possession of the truth and be unable to provide it to others who are so close! I know what you want, I know what would make you happier than you could imagine. I know the source of peace. I know where healing lies. Let me tell you! But I cannot: they would not like to hear it, it would ruin a relationship that I should continue to build, I don't have the words, etc.
I guess this doesn't make a very good blog post; there's no beginning, middle, or end. When will pain end and our Master come to relieve us unendingly?
Hello,
ReplyDeleteI read this post, and I know how you feel. I have been praying outside abortion clinics, and helping pro-life clinics before entering the nursing program. So I know how you feel, like you want to yell out the truth but can't. I really feel that prayers such as the rosary and reading the bible can bring so much peace. I know for a fact that all this topic of abortion, contraception, etc. has helped me come closer to God than I have never before. Knowing the truth from the other side is beneficial when talking to aborted mind patients so think of it that way when you are observing. Also, to keep in mind is this: Action speaks louder than words.
Thanks for reading and for your input. I'm going to pray at PP later today and I'll pray for you. God be with you through nursing school; you've chosen a beautiful profession!
DeleteGlad you didn't have to assist! I had a similar situation with a Depo-Provera injection and it's so stressful.
ReplyDeleteLoved this part: "'Knowledge is good.' It was important that I know all I could about this procedure in order to present it accurately to my future patients...the truth isn't served by coercion and misinformation." Spot on, lady!
Thanks, Katie!
Delete"If IUDs were for something besides contraception, I'd easily think IUD insertions are nifty procedures."
ReplyDeleteThe Mirena IUD is also FDA approved for the treatment of menorrhagia. Im curious as to how you feel about providing IUDs to women seeking it for this purpose?
"If IUDs were for something besides contraception, I'd easily think IUD insertions are nifty procedures."
ReplyDeleteThe Mirena IUD is FDA approved for the treatment of menorrhagia. Im curious as to how you would feel providing this method for that purpose, rather than as a contraceptive? What about in a perimenopausal woman seeking HRT?
Good point! Thanks for prompting this; I didn't think much about it until after I'd finished writing this post. Here are my thoughts, in the language of moral theology:
Delete1. A woman who is not sexually active can be licitly treated with Mirena for her abnormal bleeding.
2. Mirena doesn't really treat the cause of abnormal bleeding, but it's an effective symptom-preventer. (It's sort of like the pill, except less problematic.)
3. Mirena is a morally licit for HRT when combined with estrogen in sexually inactive, perimenopausal women with uteruses; however, I can't see how IUD+estrogen pill is any more convenient than a combined pill.
4. A sexually active woman may be able to use an IUD for menorrhagia without intending to separate the procreative from the unitive aspect of sex.
5. IUDs always have post-fertilization effects, which are abortafacient; IUDs are always illicit in sexually active women.
What do you think, Kait?