Fortnight of Frenzy?

If I survive the next two weeks, it will be a feat of incomparable scheduling gymnastics. Watch what's happening:

1. Sept 17: CMA meeting to decide if our local CMA-SS will be a chapter of the big CMA-SS (involves finances and money, etc yuck)
2. Sept 17-20: Lectures covered by Exam 2
3. Sept 20: MedSFL reception in Houston (I'm going for fundraising and networking) [too crazy]
4. Sept 21: Exam 2
5. Sept 24-27: Lectures covered by Exam 3
6. Sept 23: first (mandatory) meeting of bible study I signed up for
7. Sept 23: monthly Mass with CMA-SS members
8. Sept 25: MedSFL meeting at my school (big event I've been working on for about a year, or maybe since June 2011)
9. Sept 26-30: CMA Conference, at which I am presenting a poster. If it seems odd that I be in Minnesota at a conference and at home taking an exam, don't be confused, because...
10. Sept 25: I take Exam 3 early (four days after Exam 2)

In order to do this, I am studying Exam 3 material now. (It's awesome, it's all about cardiac conductivity; I just wish things were a little more spread out.) I'm grateful that I'm not in the anatomy lab, that I've been taught cardiac physiology at every level of my education since age 14, and that Our Lord is present in the Eucharist all the time, waiting for me to lay the head of my soul on his Heart when everything gets too hectic. 

Hopefully, this won't be a frenzied time, just a very, very busy one where I hang on to Christ's peace until the whirlwind is over.

Law, Tests, and Posters

After taking Spirituality in Medicine and Literature in Medicine, I jumped at the newly-opened chance to take something a little more hard-core: Law and Medicine. We're learning all about the role of the expert witness, which is how doctors (who aren't being sued) see the inside of courts most often.

Also, today I took the first Cardio exam! It went well.

Afterwards, I picked up the printed poster I created for the upcoming CMA conference! I am very excited. Here's the abstract that goes with the poster:

Repair of Fallopian tubes (tuboplasty) was the standard of care for tubal disease before the advent of artificial reproductive techniques like in vitro fertilization (IVF). Tuboplasty is a morally acceptable treatment for women with tubal factor infertility. 

The recession and the upcoming compensation changes in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act provide stimuli for mainstream medicine to prioritize what Catholic gynecologists know to be the ethically superior treatment. This year, the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) edited their Opinion on tubal surgery: where they had recommended IVF as the preferred treatment option for any woman with tubal disease, they now recommend tubal recanalization techniques for treatment of several tubal disorders in young women with no other significant infertility factors. 

This presentation aims to review the research prompting the ASRM’s shift and the potential corresponding shift in medical practice. Surgical techniques reviewed include falloposcopy with a linear everting catheter, guidewire cannulation, coaxial cannulation, falloposcopic catheterization, selective salpingography, fluoroscopy, and hydrotubation. The best of these techniques have success rates similar to those of IVF and should be preferred for medical and economical reasons, if not moral ones. 

In conclusion, there are manifold opportunities to increase availability of IVF alternatives in mainstream gynecology, especially to young women who suffer from tubal factor infertility. At the same time, gynecologists have a chance to popularize ethically superior alternative treatments and raise discussions among their colleagues about other morally excellent practices.

(Like NFP.)